Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Another thing which is important to consider here is that the clock has gone back to being zero based so nday 1 is the second day of the nweek.

> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:40:00 -0500
> From: wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
> 
> I submit a CFI with the title "Did this week begin?".
> 
> Plaintiff's Argument:
> {{
> The recent Refresh Proposal we adopted set the nweek to 1000 and the
> nday to 1.  The proposal was not enacted at precisely 00:00 UTC, so
> it's unclear as to whether events that occur at the beginning of an
> nweek happened at the beginning of this nweek.
> 
> The Watch is possibly in a weird state as well, since it was greater
> than 10 at the time of the resolution of the emergency, and it's quite
> unclear if it's possible to translate this into wweeks and wdays using
> the procedure in the rules.
> }}
> 
> Resolution:
> {{
> Start the clock.  Stop the clock.  [[resets the Watch]]
> 
> Set the nweek to 999 and the nday to 9.
> 
> Start the clock.
> 
> [[at 00:00 UTC, we'll have a somewhat clarified gamestate.]]
> }}
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss