Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime

Gabriel Vistica on Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:16:37 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
From: Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1296339389; bh=2iSIiUHjAy/2aWTnKXbc9LHQQiHXQSWwPOkhKHIj+Vo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ximvr5zwA6DJckzIJ+vV6do6LWejd89O8+0SggB+eERjIKvyWGOTA0VsLUC7/nCM201Sv7+EhYK7Vjhg6cMrT6JDrE6p4rDdddaxH6THjGX3KS17dhaPbipxKOklCg8yq0d+sP51YHYq42vlnIVp+JVOQUX9WQ4ZJpBTQC9mkig=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1//t87NsBmU3VItHzQsqwV6D5nQ+i/WAU5r/q/dJv0KTG9pVKxVkemMBuDcj0pyFuYf5XuhlPF+Xl0/vI2IHGtWIua5plcdFZPs19zJWezQnYO6W6CKVuUOhw2IiwgC1zJmaTANZLqOrtSE8QR48I/PFE1NaHP+tdmhT4fucGcM=;
In-reply-to: <304978.65463.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTi=pXagnyQu5QSh0vvVE7Nc-s7KAMtYXj0F9fvLZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=Ltd2yvMgkXXte5q6xJG5vZFRdgHWBmJf+8EQr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <304978.65463.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Per Rule 15, paragraph 2, an obvious variant of the voting options may be 
substituted for the actual choice, so that "sure", "nope", etc, will be 
acceptable. However, if the choice made is not obvious, it is treated as an 
Abstain.



----- Original Message ----
> From:  comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-business  <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent:  Sat, January 29, 2011 12:43:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] CFI on the nature of  ntime
> 
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  I submit a CFI with the title "Did this week begin?".
> 
> I vote TRUE, just  to be  confusing.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business  mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread