Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload

Geoffrey Spear on Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:39:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:38:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <748287.13679.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTimD6qQG5F-x-g+4y73LDoYsKrior57j01KQGCPi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <748287.13679.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't think submitting it three times will help it get around the Clock being
> Off right now. </humorous sarcasm>

I didn't think I even sent it once.  I put the computer I was writing
it on to sleep at 10:45, and it was still in Drafts when I just woke
it back up, but somehow it sent multiple times at 11:12.  Thanks,
Gmail!
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload
  - From: Gabriel Vistica

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI on the nature of ntime
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: gameplay overload
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread