Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution

Craig Daniel on Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:35:59 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:29:53 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jMFGiy30ixrESTYtOCkhXWBJpPYAgk/73i+s2m+fr8Y=; b=QDiWZuz31vQsJaD+tzxeN+bwdCZJB2k3W+HiKt1vWJdyYhM2ne4PI9qlUA8BXLUlI2 Jt+uFmBYj/yFkl0iYWGy5JL5R5qGqSC/V1kjuQIzcTfStXDy945fwhXEJL0yJ30ye52W p9VQdKU7lMd63W54XVACmYf6G8nlsgzJ9MuUw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=orpNi/+jXuTHBFLW0/vZpmkBOU+i0mXyZwpO9n2g76PwQhnLZB5op/xHHayQMv0m2c xQ0mFGrpDh/5Xsyx72S/R8HZCTBvofPCoKeNmCbGFyM8hJKyICM0zgvMd3SU7Uy1zeWI W+/3pVHVPwKaSB5shMsBoE19uMWyOpzM8HPYQ=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimpph3i=Y=PmwxsdqXrGf5qPyGedG_zW=D=6UPX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTimB8qMqcFhMsPfcNiUxDN596qq-YM1fi39gsL1N@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimX70vmzrduhvBg2oWyWhZ3tZcYU=OZnJEBT5QK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinpzL+Fk9p9TziRR6pMWo+Q2ak2dhR-iQi9GL2B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <646015.33113.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <486916.98052.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <719773.1259.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W6329D156A18330FE36902B85F00@xxxxxxx> <AANLkTimpph3i=Y=PmwxsdqXrGf5qPyGedG_zW=D=6UPX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:49 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I vote for the Refresh Proposal submitted by teucer.
>
> Me too.
>
> I explicitly state that destroying me (not my in-game avatar) is a
> punishment worse than losing and reserve my right to deregister rather
> than be destroyed, in the event that time-travelling future players
> decide to enforce platonic gamestate.

The RP as most recently revised no longer does this. But even if it
did, the current rules forbid time travel, so enforcing the platonic
gamestate would require them to do so without visiting the present.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution
  - From: Gabriel Vistica

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency Resolution
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Go.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread