Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto

Craig Daniel on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:38:24 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:38:21 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=gBs+yulFEZ6PhhnU2UTEegOGg/jXPdzvFY7Pk7m+tII=; b=G3PE6uRLny1Uppko9iSBghiaB0kpRfKtZcrRt6a5KqXs2LxU14tOupsQuXzX66/Wth VZGUbUreyxDlD9tridg/MVeWaWuOPARChHrTENE99wt1C4v7Bje6H91q64T6obvHbrU9 FIJXhBmlenfzH47SZIX0GZ5DTt8ceXach+efA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Q658LXKiXwfVLCmKDyitKdaQgGmTlq0pwdOBBC6LUVgQcjqsx56qJx96Fpvbx9QjNo 7P3UmgzEJwr1cq/H+1GeT20Gvm9oC/3D9QM37KXVcFS3+HD/7MRypx0TTcTAEjR+UA1H 39W4Hq4FS9oxXRCoVieWqNfHCtVzUhLJA2v0c=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikNiYYFQ6b-YTc15byatar_5NTT7fOcTFtSGcX6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <95CB6A48-D854-4DEA-A8FE-B6F5D4AF2F98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikHb5xC4QMKNO95KPkTCQC2cEGbyoV=H-ZQsR56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimdQuZ6N8LXXc8kAaQSiode80d6p+WD_Y0xdJT0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <790443.98202.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikHhjD27rpTyTnBEJweZLGTyrBmOjgbTup1tVMO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin-t3qd0YmYnbT8kyozSijg4kcOME5jN6ZuoXE+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikNiYYFQ6b-YTc15byatar_5NTT7fOcTFtSGcX6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:03 AM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think I'm gonna vote against replacing the ruleset with "DARWIN ->
>> \_" even if it gives me credit.
>
> Well, that's clearly not what the proposal does since the link is to
> the unmangled action=raw version. :)

Yeah, I know. That one at least creates a playable (indeed, played!)
game. Whereas I'm pretty sure we'd have a lot of trouble playing
DARWIN.

Although with the right ruleset, an evolution-themed DARWINnomic could be fun.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: Gabriel Vistica
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread