Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto

comex on Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:35:29 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:03:43 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5IYrRmVOKrra1+e6kXWte0SGKaBaWWcklJ6Zyd7nci4=; b=I0cbR/0yQqiNoAVWbqqcoB/mDu+8Yfms0E8Vr1EDIaHfjyhOaS5dgMnuRW7n45TO4Q DqMO4nkQScOamoOstRkWhhzI5MWk79W/6NTSAlpLfaUFFumeN3HnklHYrP6HP1r3L76A n4iI5tmccF8B3gUukDTOjVtBoEjBawxkBHX9k=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=i6It9mQomIWr0nfD5e17pDczXfwluaaDLxPJ/39QI3wNG1ZoRzKB0BPrNfbGgQ8cMw c0bXGG+bP59dGU63xtSP1um5Ia69qCrUP+zOgzei/yqU2eug5dIAUcJIcuYjgHcBn9h2 oGOq6CpD/fGZDpLbeOBRTkYk0ovp4NHyUyM5k=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTin-t3qd0YmYnbT8kyozSijg4kcOME5jN6ZuoXE+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <95CB6A48-D854-4DEA-A8FE-B6F5D4AF2F98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikHb5xC4QMKNO95KPkTCQC2cEGbyoV=H-ZQsR56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimdQuZ6N8LXXc8kAaQSiode80d6p+WD_Y0xdJT0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <790443.98202.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikHhjD27rpTyTnBEJweZLGTyrBmOjgbTup1tVMO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin-t3qd0YmYnbT8kyozSijg4kcOME5jN6ZuoXE+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think I'm gonna vote against replacing the ruleset with "DARWIN ->
> \_" even if it gives me credit.

Well, that's clearly not what the proposal does since the link is to
the unmangled action=raw version. :)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: Gabriel Vistica

References:
- [s-d] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: Gabriel Vistica
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's RP proto
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread