Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123a

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is an invalid ruling.

Per Rule 42, "an Appeals Court shall give one of the following responses to the 
Appeal: 1.) AFFIRMS  - The appeals court affirms the decision made in the prior 
Judgement. 2.) VACATES  - The appeals court reverses the decision made in the 
prior Judgement. 3.) MODIFIES - The appeals court modifies the decision made in 
the prior Judgement, and includes a new Judgement. 4.) REMAND   - The appeals 
court returns the CFI to the prior Judge for review. "



----- Original Message ----
> From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sun, August 1, 2010 4:10:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123a
> 
> I answer CFI 123a TRUE, deferring to the arguments of the appellant. 
> On Jul  27, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at  4:45 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> >>  FALSE. The player generally known as teucer does not have the name "Murphy"  
>as
> >> this name is already in use as a unique identifier for another  player. If 
>teucer
> >> were to have the name "Murphy", that would violate  the first paragraph of 
>Rule
> >> 2/0, "All game entities must have  uniquely identifying names", which I 
>interpret
> >> to mean that all  identifying names held by a player [[basically all names 
>that
> >> aren't  titles]].
> > 
> > I appeal the above judgement. Arguments: While the  judge is correct
> > that "All game entities must have uniquely-identifying  names", and
> > this unambiguously means all identifying names held by  players must be
> > unique, the fact that something MUST happen does *not*  mean that it
> > does - merely that players who MUST do something are in  violation of
> > the rule in question. (See Rule 14.) Ergo, the MUST clause  in Rule 2
> > does not block me from becoming a player with the relevant  name; it
> > merely means that the other Murphy is breaking Rule 2. (I do  have to
> > specify a unique name when joining, but as I in fact specified  four of
> > them I should be good.)
> > 
> > - teucer
> >  _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing  list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> >  http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business  mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss