Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI - I am named uniquely

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gitchel wrote:
>
>> CFI - my name is unique despite attempts of other player(s) to
>> make it non-unique.
>>
>> Argument: the state of my once-unique name does not change due
>> to the actions of other players. Players who change or adopt
>> names after my name is unique can only determine their own
>> name's uniqueness by comparison to already existing unique
>> names, and are successful in choosing their own unique names
>> when both their name and mine are unique. If their name is
>> non-unique in comparison to my name, then they have failed to
>> choose a unique name, but mine therefore must remain unique.
>
> teucer re-registered before specifying eir latest list of alleged
> names, so Rule 2 arguably renders ineffective the names from that
> list that would otherwise have been non-unique.  It would've been
> more ambiguous if e had stated
>  "I wish to be known by <list of names>.  I register."
> as Rule 46 does not apply to em while e is not a player.

Specifying names is generally held to be part of the process of
registration, as it is not the case that a player who simply posts "I
register" does so namelessly.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss