Ed Murphy on Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:05:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI - I am named uniquely |
Gitchel wrote: > CFI - my name is unique despite attempts of other player(s) to > make it non-unique. > > Argument: the state of my once-unique name does not change due > to the actions of other players. Players who change or adopt > names after my name is unique can only determine their own > name's uniqueness by comparison to already existing unique > names, and are successful in choosing their own unique names > when both their name and mine are unique. If their name is > non-unique in comparison to my name, then they have failed to > choose a unique name, but mine therefore must remain unique. teucer re-registered before specifying eir latest list of alleged names, so Rule 2 arguably renders ineffective the names from that list that would otherwise have been non-unique. It would've been more ambiguous if e had stated "I wish to be known by <list of names>. I register." as Rule 46 does not apply to em while e is not a player. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss