Alex Smith on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:59:23 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's add some gameplay, shall we?


On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Also, could you have the rule explicitly state that it refers to "the player
> >> compsciguy". I want to avoid problems with Rule 2.
> >
> > I hereby amend my recent proposal by replacing the string
> > {{compsciguy}} with {{the player compsciguy}}.
> >
> 
> Just realized that's ambiguous, so I hereby amend it again, by
> replacing the string {{compsciguy}} with {{known only as
> "compsciguy"}}.

Also incorrect. I'm sure other people (non-nomic-related) know em by
other names.

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss