Alex Smith on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:59:23 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's add some gameplay, shall we? |
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Also, could you have the rule explicitly state that it refers to "the player > >> compsciguy". I want to avoid problems with Rule 2. > > > > I hereby amend my recent proposal by replacing the string > > {{compsciguy}} with {{the player compsciguy}}. > > > > Just realized that's ambiguous, so I hereby amend it again, by > replacing the string {{compsciguy}} with {{known only as > "compsciguy"}}. Also incorrect. I'm sure other people (non-nomic-related) know em by other names. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss