| Jeff Gitchel on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:04:39 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster for Nweek 172 |
Sheesh. Whose idea was this alternate calendar thing? (No offense meant to anyone here who may have been involved.) Just an informal poll: is there support for revamping the time-keeping to be a bit more Gregorian? Or maybe something in a nice base10? Ten-ish anyone? I'd love to try something with a ten day cycle. -- Jeff Gitchel jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://turtlemoon.org twitter: gitchel On 23/07/2010, at 18:56, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The nweek isn't over yet, so I'm still your mentee (no points yet for you) and > the voting isn't over yet. > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Jeff Gitchel <gitchel@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: "spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Fri, July 23, 2010 4:50:42 PM >> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster for Nweek 172 >> >> >> Just wondering if this also includes the extra 5 points I get for having a >> ex-mentee with a positive score. >> >> >> I have to ask, since I'm numerically challenged. :-/ >> >> BTW, did my proposal pass? Or have we got that far yet? >> >> I'm chronologically challenged, too. >> >> -- >> Jeff Gitchel >> jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://turtlemoon.org >> twitter: gitchel >> >> On 23/07/2010, at 18:32, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>>> From: jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >>>> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:27:40 +0100 >>>> Subject: Re: [s-b] [Registrar] Roster for Nweek 172 >>> >>>> >>>> Ah, I resubmitted last nweek's report but I must have forgot to put it on >> the wiki (which I adjusted and copied this nweek's report).I hereby publish >> this revised Roster for nweek 172: >>> >>> >>> That got a bit mangled, here is the Roster for nweek 172, hopefully better >> formatted: >>> >>> name - email - joined - score - charm - activity - respect - style - >> mischievousness - attributes >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> Rule -9999 - bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - 2009-05-11 - 41 - 1 - 3 - 0 - 0 - -9 >> - >> >>> - quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - 2009-05-11 - 5 - 0 - -2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >>> Hose - mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx - 2009-10-08 - 0 - -1 - -2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Third >> Era Veteran >>> JamesB - jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - 2009-05-11 - 391 - 11 - 9 - 0 - 0 - -30 - >> >>> Marr965 - darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx - 2009-07-09 - 10 - -3 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >> Figment >>> Murphy - emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx - 2009-07-09 - 91 - 8 - 7 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >>> - teucer@xxxxxxxxx - 2010-06-14 - -2 - -1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >>> Gitchel, The One and Only Respected One - gitchel@xxxxxxxxx - 2010-05-18 - 24 >> - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >> >>> lilomar - lilomar2525@xxxxxxxxx - 2010-06-24 - 3 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >>> compsciguy - gvistica@xxxxxxxxx - 2010-06-29 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >>> 703B E29B E9CC E4ED A7E2 7F62 1608 627B 1BA5 7726 - ais523@xxxxxxxxxx - >> 2010-07-01 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - >> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/ >>> Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spoon-business mailing list >>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss