Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 119

[Jeff Gitchel <gitchel@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/07/2010, at 18:32, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Gitchel wrote:
> 
>> Proposal: the last paragraph of rule 69 is changed from:
>> 
>> If no Mentor is available when a request for a Mentor is made, or no Mentor is available to become a NewbieÂfs Mentor, that Newbie gains 5 Points.
>> 
>> To:
>> 
>> If no Mentor is available when a request for a Mentor is made, or no eligible Player  is available to become a NewbieÂfs Mentor, that Newbie gains 5 Points.
> 
> FYI there's already at least one proposal already in the works to fix
> various issues with Rule 69.
> _______________________________________________
> 




I knew that. But I like mine better. It was simile and to the point. In fact I think I saw another point. There is no one to assign mentors, and no way to know who is available or chosen.

I tune and modify:
}}
Proposal: the last paragraph of rule 69 is changed from:

If no Mentor is available when a request for a Mentor is made, or no Mentor is available to become a NewbieÂfs Mentor, that Newbie gains 5 Points.

To:

If no Mentor is available when a request for a Mentor is made, or no eligible Player  is available to become a NewbieÂ's Mentor, that Newbie gains 5 Points. Assignments of Players to Mentorship should be made by the Registrar within 3 ndays of a Newbie's request for a Mentor, and should regard multiple requests for a Mentor from a Newbie that occur within 3 ndays of the first request by that Newbie. The Registrar shall maintain a roster of which Players are eligible to be Mentors, which Players are Mentors, who a Mentor is Mentor to, and which Newbies are available to become Mentees and the time period of their Newbiehood.  
{{ 

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss