Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 118 and some other clarifications

Ed Murphy on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:09:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 118 and some other clarifications

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 118 and some other clarifications
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:33:41 -0700
In-reply-to: <SNT109-W7761ACAB0903872B89DA985CC0@xxxxxxx>
References: <703200C2-3A18-470C-8BA7-49621CF1F6FC@xxxxxxxxx>, <SNT109-W2FF25207984E3E0703A5785CC0@xxxxxxx>, <4C2BBEB1.3020509@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <76F08106-D70A-4A45-B9D7-A8C724ED6DCD@xxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W7761ACAB0903872B89DA985CC0@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

JamesB wrote:

>> Oh, and what's he mean by "gratuitous"?
> 
> Just that the arguments are given freely without him being required to give them (as he had not been assigned as judge when he submitted the gratuitous arguments).

This is yet another example of the sort of Agora-isms with which
I have plagued B for quite some time.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Leave
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 118 and some other clarifications
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread