Craig Daniel on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:14:45 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI 116 |
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ...actually Rule 60 and 49.B.4 combine to allow something decidedly > more amusing than what I was hoping to do once I'd established my > ability to have multiple names. So: > > I hereby change my name to {{Respected One}}. > > - the guy who now automatically has no name at all. It's worth noting by the way that the above means I am in violation of the rule which says that I must have a uniquely-identifying name, but failing to do things you must do has no punishment so I don't care. - _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss