Craig Daniel on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:14:45 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI 116


On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...actually Rule 60 and 49.B.4 combine to allow something decidedly
> more amusing than what I was hoping to do once I'd established my
> ability to have multiple names. So:
>
> I hereby change my name to {{Respected One}}.
>
>  - the guy who now automatically has no name at all.

It's worth noting by the way that the above means I am in violation of
the rule which says that I must have a uniquely-identifying name, but
failing to do things you must do has no punishment so I don't care.

 -
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss