|
Craig Daniel on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:35:21 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI 116
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:35:17 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=AsS/EbC99RRePB9RHo6g4aATs4gOmr4O4sFDGrK2pZc=; b=Ml993ahyHYbT+sgiU/5Ba0vj2w/7CnVQpjA1iA5XdK0ViAdxwApVhVjybN2QFXYIn9 Reak+DNU1jIAhnP2QiJvR59InoAmbG6Ld1ExFk0wWaJQ9eFjROkydE9smmmKAo2OuWCs 9zB/wyU2wsPaqWWTPf/Cxg4YOh66SJnJ8tFNs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=W1cIaOgAMAkMSJMesbOKp1/qBdX1vyGAMwNsyuj60J+YlY192sxGD/WWKVJj6gzhtS QJ+QExAJGTVQlvj9wpHyMyVp9A1D5leiIvbLB86WiFDR3Fp7V1HAmEtj/zT/QjsQFHk3 PgVKSWPyFPZyvy7YohvLfQhvWAhzgFctkHMcI=
- In-reply-to: <SNT109-W137673906E22687BACA85385CB0@xxxxxxx>
- References: <AANLkTilDkDnwXKcZWaCH1oogGGrQYZAckqVH1tp2yKfE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <648198.70999.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W137673906E22687BACA85385CB0@xxxxxxx>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:08 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is Proposal 2035. However, I think I should point out that there are no actions that are prohibited; perhaps it might be better to
> just punish violation of rules.
Prohibited is synonymous with "must not," and as far as I can tell the
only things that violate rules are those which are prohibited and
failure to do those things which are mandatory. But in general I
agree, as other ways to violate the rules may arise in the future.
- {various names}
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss