Re: [s-d] [s-b] Nature of Rules

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:16:42 -0700
> From: quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Nature of Rules
> 
> > 
> ________________________________
> > From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 2:48:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [s-b] Nature of Rules
> >
> > Assuming a script has not already assigned this to anyone, this is CFI 113 and I assign it to Judge Codae.
> >
> > On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:25 PM, M P Darke wrote:
> >
> > > Pursuant to CFI 112, I submit a CFI:
> > > "This Nomic is non-existant."
> > > Reasoning:
> > > If there is no subset of Entity called a Rule, there is no such entity as a Rule, meaning this Nomic is > > > undefined.
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> This appears to be an assignment to me, although later messages dispute that.  Before I reply, I have a question.
> 
> WHAT is everyone saying about scripts?  I have no evidence that the Oracle's duties are being carried out by a script, and no readout from anything of the sort.  I already checked my spam folder, and there wasn't anything relevant there; I looked on the wiki, and didn't encounter help there either.
> 
> What is the source of this stuff?
> 
> Codae
> 
> P.S. In the interest of courtesy, I've put my message at the bottom and added the angle brackets.


I'm not entirely sure what the discussion about scripts is either - I do all my ministerial duties by hand.

I think the later assignment is correct as 0x44 could not usurp the Oracle without the consent of B. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss