M P Darke on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:12:58 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI - The nature of shadows.


I have. There is no rule that defines Rules.

--- On Mon, 14/6/10, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI - The nature of shadows.
To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, 14 June, 2010, 22:31

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:16 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for lending support.

You mistake me. I haven't yet finished reading the ruleset and so
cannot yet comment on whether or not I am in fact a rule.

 - Rule 700
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss