Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI - The nature of shadows.

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Marr965 wrote:

> --- On Fri, 11/6/10, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [s-b] CFI - The nature of shadows.
> To: "B Nomic Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, 11 June, 2010, 16:39
> 
> 0x44 wrote:
> 
>> I usurp the Oracle specifying a reward of 9.
>> This is CFI 112. I assign it to Judge Murphy.
>>
>> On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:37 PM, 0x44 wrote:
>>
>>> I CFI on "Rule 10 is a Rule."
>>> Arguments: It is an entity named "Rule 10".
> 
> If this assignment is valid, then I judge True.  In general, in the
> apparent absence of an explicit definition of "rule", common sense
> suggests the definition "entity created according to a B-defined
> mechanism and clearly labeled as being a rule".

> I object to this answer. If I changed my name to Rule 203, I would
> still not be a rule.

You were not "created according to a B-defined mechanism".

(also, please don't top-post)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss