Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 165

James Baxter on Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:18:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 165

To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 165
From: James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:18:48 +0100
In-reply-to: <4BC716F6.2090406@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <SNT109-W54E0B7DB0816586C9AC04385110@xxxxxxx>, <4BC716F6.2090406@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:39:02 -0700
> From: emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 165
> 
> > 2021 - LOGAS reports (JamesB)
> AGAINST (tries to amend nonexistent Rule 79, should be 59)

Rule 59 was renumbered to rule 79 by Proposal 2016 but it hasn't been updated on the wiki yet as the rulekeepor is vacant.


 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 111
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 111
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 165
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 111
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread