Re: [s-d] [s-b] Continued voting and a new emergency

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: ais523@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:28:44 +0000
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Continued voting and a new emergency
> > 
> > No, because we have emergencies there is still a way for us to make
> > arbitrary changes to the ruleset. That Rule 31 doesn't exist any more
> > and can't fix the game from the past. 		 	   		  
> 
> If emergencies aren't broken, they aren't broken and we can fix the game
> with one. If they are, then the previous emergency failed due to making
> B not a nomic (? this might need checking, how did precedence work
> then?)
> 
> -- 
> ais523
> 


I believe emergencies aren't broken as they aren't based on voting periods. That is why I am attempting to initiate an emergency to fix voting periods. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss