Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:59:37 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah |
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2. Appeals of Consultations and appeals of Oracularities are distinct, > though if a result is overturned obviously the Oracularity must be > thrown out also. What if there's no Answer at all, but instead a Consultation is a body of text describing the particulars of some sort of game-related controversy and the Oracularity is another body of text describing What We're Going To Do About It. The "appeals" process consists of the rest of us democratically deciding if WWGTDAI is consistent with prevailing doctrine, and if so, we Do That. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss