|
Craig Daniel on Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:16:27 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:16:20 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YpkcziZBDK3Wt6RcDmzIqUQGc+ZYSeKJ+JOB9TJYu+Y=; b=B9p+8z0Uh12/8l8ON/uRGtuN+n7FUcJsRxiKkP3Ct3YQLxyQZIsJ1Y/RkMC9EMp1A6 AK5qYhaoH99cxYbpCClnQ3NHSp+vGfSfdF+5oR7g306wBaeTDTqRw4GwfXK3CFbuSe1D 6EbbCXvoNbbffevOgzfNw0k16PtE4Kz84DJMQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ds0E26LBEyQ/v2T8bkXIPxhWsmE0FST1WWt7D6QS7GQ9aCZkS2LqESdeuxRq/AVd6Y 1W8cQ3McOqHKOZlgRYCxy1ddDLNVa9mTk1w0Fdv37vOdTc+1xgj5PTUE8gcZJ4LdeCMB fcacI+KB9aHg/6w5l38dVz0AbZ7jtetRfkESM=
- In-reply-to: <537475.33555.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <55b258c20911011753x25107946g39298cbceadfe1fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <537475.33555.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Objection: Please consider the use of the term "person" in psychology.
No.
That is neither ordinary language nor mathematical or legal usage.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss