| C-walker on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:02:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Deputy Gardener] Gnome Report |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Geoffrey Spear<wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:15 PM, > C-walker<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Geoffrey Spear<wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I deputize for the Gardener to publish the following report of Gnome holdings. >>> >>> Wa Ea He Ai Ba >>> BobTHJ: 1 27 0 1 0 >>> C-walker: 1 4 0 1 1 >>> Codae: 0 1 0 0 0 >>> Goethe: 1 5 1 1 0 >>> Tiger: 0 1 0 0 0 >>> Wooble: 2 20 0 3 0 >>> teucer: 1 4 0 0 1 >> >> Are you sure those Earth Gnome holdings are correct? There is a >> 3-per-week limit as the gain is 'a number of Earth Gnomes equal to the >> highest interest index among all such offices'. > > I'm not absolutely sure any of them are correct, but BobTHJ and I > gained 3 each most weeks over a 7 week period. Fair enough, with that explanation it seems close enough to me. If there are no other comments do you think it would be wise to ratify? > BTW, there's a serious bug in the Water Gnome in that it ripped off > one of the old Notes that was for having at least one adopted proposal > and no narrowly rejected proposals because there were different Notes > depending on having differing about of narrowly rejected proposals. > Thus, if you have some adopted proposals and any narrowly rejected > proposals you get nothing, while if you have an adopted proposal and > horrible proposals that are overwhelmingly rejected, you get the same > reward as if all of your proposals were adopted. Suggestion: replace it with II 1 proposal adopted in previous week. -- C-walker _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss