C-walker on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:38:25 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [gardener] I don't think there were any proposals passed...

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Craig Daniel<teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Note: as we don't seem to have anyone updating
> http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Ministries ever, my belief that both
> Promotor and Gardener have an II of 1 may be false. If it is, please
> CoE me.

CoE: Office IIs are as follows:

Title        II
Accountor     1
Ambassador    1
Anarchist     1
Assessor      2
Conductor     3
CotC          3
Grand Poobah  1
Herald        1
IADoP         1
Insulator     1
Janitor       1
Notary        3
Promotor      2
Registrar     1
Rulekeepor    3
Scorekeepor   1
Tailor        1

Although I will change two of these in my next message.

C-walker, who thinks that if Blognomic can alter universal constants,
e can certainly disobey the laws of physics in B.
spoon-discuss mailing list