Charles Walker on Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:15:53 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 6 assigned to Judge Goethe

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jonatan
> Kilhamn<jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Right before the Agoran ruleset was adopted, a rule was created that
> > alowed players to claim things that were not game objects (or however
> > it was phrased). C-waker immediately went on to claim Barrack Obama
> > and eir fellow player's brains, among other things. So it's
> > essentially a question about whether gamestate carries over when it's
> > no longer recognised by the rules.
> Gratuitous arguments: under the old ruleset, anything in the game was
> a game object.  Thus, if claims were in the game, they were game
> objects and destroyed by the Refresh Proposal which explicitly
> destroyed all game objects except for itself.  If they weren't game
> objects, they weren't part of the gamestate so in the absence of rules
> making them part of the gamestate in the new ruleset, they're not part
> of the gamestate.

Just to clarify for Judge  Goethe, this is almost certainly FALSE.
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
spoon-discuss mailing list