Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ambassador's Report

Charles Walker on Sat, 30 May 2009 07:51:22 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ambassador's Report

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ambassador's Report
From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:50:56 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=XOXJiult94QF1/4A2AUZ7MPDIxeYNAJZJMTWM/vkky0=; b=p21Zi2//gYlhpYDqzap294KhQoWQgDpQhA+V4qbd/7OXMR62e46KQcGsUDd+WJ0+3A 9p6OPxjw0ZcSaG1qNWtdgU64iEoEzqHtcS0ueCaQzcP4NPSAqNwmdvyGoLBJJZygB4jJ p7Cuye741/F2hBxdZRdD/lwKMuWuVHKY/JFTw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=FVPZ8seP7W82Q3WrJnftrLvLtulHMnsdCkVRFvtHW0d3IQixrUmwEnZji01jQW59xG aMs2YEypS2tYpJshjm+McX2MNE9DhIPHMbHGUpCMUz4ZTYZ6vuXmRdDnNA2y/yONSkwc 6qUK3mhtC2zHVWTvq6Z1eBf8giCAnHbOldY3k=
In-reply-to: <653283240905251338l15631fcew131c66b0730e6706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dc05cc2c0905250832k384a4294t9620c907ef5acc4f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240905251338l15631fcew131c66b0730e6706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Charles Walker
> <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As of my last message to spoon-business, the recognition of various
> nomics
> > has been flipped. They will be informed of this. I intend, with Bn
> Consent,
> > to join Internomic II on behalf of B.
>
> Object.


I forgot about this. There are currently two supporters and two objectors,
so can I go ahead?

-- 
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel, then?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] mackerel again
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel, then?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] mackerel again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread