| Charles Walker on Wed, 27 May 2009 12:06:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal |
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:57 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote: > > /* The following proposal/PoO (depending on the current ruleset) > > merges the essential elements of the current Agoran rules with the > > essential elements of the probably-current B Nomic rules; the intent > > is to create a game that is recognizably B but with some of the > > stability of Agora. In general, rules numbering less than 100 are > > inessential B Nomic rules (with the exception of the very essential > > Rule 0), rules numbered 101-200 are significant Agoran rules, rules > > numbered 201-300 are essential B Nomic rules, and rules numbered 301 > > or higher are either new rules introduced to help fuse the two > > rulesets or rules that fused corresponding rules out of both old > > rulesets. This strips us of contract law and gameplay, both of which > > ought to be reinserted either by non-emergent means or by subsequent > > Points of Order. */ > > If we're under the Agora-like ruleset - and I think we are - you'll have > to set its Adoption Index to at least 3 for it to work. And specify a non-simultaneous order for the rule changes to be made in. -- C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss