Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:57 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> /* The following proposal/PoO (depending on the current ruleset)
> merges the essential elements of the current Agoran rules with the
> essential elements of the probably-current B Nomic rules; the intent
> is to create a game that is recognizably B but with some of the
> stability of Agora. In general, rules numbering less than 100 are
> inessential B Nomic rules (with the exception of the very essential
> Rule 0), rules numbered 101-200 are significant Agoran rules, rules
> numbered 201-300 are essential B Nomic rules, and rules numbered 301
> or higher are either new rules introduced to help fuse the two
> rulesets or rules that fused corresponding rules out of both old
> rulesets. This strips us of contract law and gameplay, both of which
> ought to be reinserted either by non-emergent means or by subsequent
> Points of Order. */

If we're under the Agora-like ruleset - and I think we are - you'll have
to set its Adoption Index to at least 3 for it to work.

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss