Alex Smith on Tue, 12 May 2009 12:50:31 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Simplify Massively |
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 15:47 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Agoran precedent doesn't apply here (although previous Consultations > > arguably do), and it's probably a lot more reasonable to assume all > > players are subscribed to s-b since they all were within the past few > > days. > > Previous Consultations clearly apply, since they're this game's precedent. > > For that matter, I think previous CFIs from 1e B apply, which means > we're back to being Fucking Nuts. Luckily, precedents aren't binding, just one of the possible ways to resolve controversies when the rules are silent. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss