Jonatan Kilhamn on Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:39 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Simplify Massively


2009/5/11 Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:04, Jonatan Kilhamn
> <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2009/5/11 Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:17 PM
>>> Subject: Simplify Massively
>>> To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>> THIS MESSAGE IS CLEARLY INTENDED TO BE PUBLIC.
>>> HEIL ERIS!
>>> I submit the following proposal:
>>>
>>> {{
>>> (AI = 3), (II = 3)
>>> Enact the entire ruleset found at <http://txtb.in/2BB>, and flip the ID
>>> number, title, power and text of each such rule to the value it has on that
>>> website, and repeal all other rules. Flip the Citizenship of all persons who
>>> voted FOR this proposal to Registered, and the Citizenship of all other
>>> persons to Unregistered.
>>> Oh, and flip the Citizenship of anyone who used the phrase "B Nomic" in an
>>> email to agora-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the dates of 11th, 12th or 13th
>>> of May 2009 UTC to registered, just for fun.
>>> }}
>>>
>> It's "Hail Eris" with an "a", actually.
>> I'm gonna give B one more try now that it's bit more familiar.
>>
>> I register.
>> I nominate myself for International Associate Director of Personnel,
>> thereby initiating an election for the office. (Nominations are open
>> four four days, then anyone can deputise for the IADoP to initiate the
>> actual B decision to determine the new officeholder.)
>> I nominate c-walker for Promotor and Clerk of the Courts. I nominate
>> myself for Assessor.
>>
> What the hey...
>
> I register.
>
> I submit the following proposal (AI 3, II 1):
> {
> Remove the number of each rule. All past rule ID numbers cease to
> exist. Then assign each rule a sequential ID number beginning with 1
> according to the order they were listed in the document referenced by
> the most recent passed refresh proposal.
> }
>
I'm not entirely sure that's a good idea, since the logical ruleset
sorts the rules out of categories, and renumbering them in that order
will cause the precedence to look different... But maybe that's not a
big problem.

-- 
-Tiger
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss