Jonatan Kilhamn on Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:39 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Simplify Massively |
2009/5/11 Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:04, Jonatan Kilhamn > <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2009/5/11 Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:17 PM >>> Subject: Simplify Massively >>> To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> >>> THIS MESSAGE IS CLEARLY INTENDED TO BE PUBLIC. >>> HEIL ERIS! >>> I submit the following proposal: >>> >>> {{ >>> (AI = 3), (II = 3) >>> Enact the entire ruleset found at <http://txtb.in/2BB>, and flip the ID >>> number, title, power and text of each such rule to the value it has on that >>> website, and repeal all other rules. Flip the Citizenship of all persons who >>> voted FOR this proposal to Registered, and the Citizenship of all other >>> persons to Unregistered. >>> Oh, and flip the Citizenship of anyone who used the phrase "B Nomic" in an >>> email to agora-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the dates of 11th, 12th or 13th >>> of May 2009 UTC to registered, just for fun. >>> }} >>> >> It's "Hail Eris" with an "a", actually. >> I'm gonna give B one more try now that it's bit more familiar. >> >> I register. >> I nominate myself for International Associate Director of Personnel, >> thereby initiating an election for the office. (Nominations are open >> four four days, then anyone can deputise for the IADoP to initiate the >> actual B decision to determine the new officeholder.) >> I nominate c-walker for Promotor and Clerk of the Courts. I nominate >> myself for Assessor. >> > What the hey... > > I register. > > I submit the following proposal (AI 3, II 1): > { > Remove the number of each rule. All past rule ID numbers cease to > exist. Then assign each rule a sequential ID number beginning with 1 > according to the order they were listed in the document referenced by > the most recent passed refresh proposal. > } > I'm not entirely sure that's a good idea, since the logical ruleset sorts the rules out of categories, and renumbering them in that order will cause the precedence to look different... But maybe that's not a big problem. -- -Tiger _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss