| Charles Walker on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:12:00 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inactivity... |
I haven't answered yet... C-walker On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:58 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I claim this answer to be inconsistent, obviously marr cares. > > - 0x44 > > > On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:49, Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I intend, without objection, to answer Consultation 237 NO. >> >> C-walker >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Marr965 wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone on B actually care whether the Player known as Marr965 >>>> >>> actually exists or not? >>> >>> This is Consultation 237. I assign it to Priest c-walker. >>> >>> I become Inactive. >>>> >>> >>> This is ineffective, but I'll avoid assigning you as a Priest until you >>> return to (unofficial) active status. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spoon-business mailing list >>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss