Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inactivity...

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I claim this answer to be inconsistent, obviously marr cares.

- 0x44

On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:49, Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> wrote:

> I intend, without objection, to answer Consultation 237 NO.
>
> C-walker
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> wrote:
>
> > Marr965 wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone on B actually care whether the Player known as Marr965
> > actually exists or not?
> >
> > This is Consultation 237.  I assign it to Priest c-walker.
> >
> > > I become Inactive.
> >
> > This is ineffective, but I'll avoid assigning you as a Priest until  
> > you
> > return to (unofficial) active status.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss