Re: [s-d] agora

[Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

B's Agoran obligations could be easily assigned to the Ambassador. And I
don't think there will be any objections as things seem to be pretty dead
around here...

C-walker


On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Warrigal
<ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx<ihope127%2Bw@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:

> By default, being a party to B Nomic as recognized by Agora is
> independent of both being a player of B Nomic and being a player of
> Agora: people who play neither can be a party, and people who play
> both can opt out. However, I think the current B definition of
> "player" makes every player of B a party to B Nomic as recognized by
> Agora, whether they actually play Agora or not.
>
> I think it would be possible to make B Nomic a public contract without
> the objection of a party. This is an Agoran action, so the
> announcement of intent and objections both have to go to Agora; one
> does not need to be a player of Agora either to announce intent or to
> object. B Nomic would be eligible for playerhood in Agora if B's rules
> stated who was responsible for carrying out B's obligations in Agora.
>
> --Warrigal
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss