| Warrigal on Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:43:15 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] agora |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The Agoran Notary lists the parties of B as Warrigal. Even with the > recent forfeits, surely there is someone else here that also plays Agora? > > > C-walker, who is vaguely interested in joining the big Ag By default, being a party to B Nomic as recognized by Agora is independent of both being a player of B Nomic and being a player of Agora: people who play neither can be a party, and people who play both can opt out. However, I think the current B definition of "player" makes every player of B a party to B Nomic as recognized by Agora, whether they actually play Agora or not. I think it would be possible to make B Nomic a public contract without the objection of a party. This is an Agoran action, so the announcement of intent and objections both have to go to Agora; one does not need to be a player of Agora either to announce intent or to object. B Nomic would be eligible for playerhood in Agora if B's rules stated who was responsible for carrying out B's obligations in Agora. --Warrigal _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss