Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting Results

Alex Smith on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:19:57 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting Results

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting Results
From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:19:48 +0100
In-reply-to: <653283240904071308o1538f7cfg39f82de5389d63a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650904022309w701f160cg74bac9e7d89f9a0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240904071308o1538f7cfg39f82de5389d63a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 16:08 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I believe P1911 reverses the effects of every proposal that passed in
> nweek 156 (they all failed quorum), and thus changed a bunch of the
> rules, scoring for passed proposals, probably the ability of several
> of us to buy weapons, and thus the Health of anyone who was attacked.

Does it reverse whether it itself passed? If so, does that cause a
paradox?
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting Results
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reordering
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Reordering
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting Results
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting Results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread