Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation

[Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

True. I think the rules might need changing there. In response to 0x44, I
would say that e is right to say that it is unlikely that Agora will vote by
nday 13, but they might in the future.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, my interpretation would be that Agora (along with a WHOLE BUNCH of
> other organizations/states/contracts/etc. out there) is a partnership. They
> are all recognized by B Nomic by virtue of fulfilling the 3 criteria
> listed.
>
> The only bit that might NOT make it (and some other groups) an agreement is
> that it does not refer to its members as "parties". B can't just
> arbitrarily
> decide that what someone else calls a member, a disciple, or a citizen is
> in
> fact a "party".
>
> It's sort of a moot point anyway until anyone tries to make Agora a
> Faction,
> since other than potential factionhood, being an Agreement currently does
> not mean a thing in B.
>
> BP
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss