Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:58:20 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Hurried Proposals


On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I see your point, and thing both without-objection or majority-vote would
> > work. My only gripe is with the time period. 1 *-day might very well be
> too
> > little time for those adversely affected by a proposal to actually happen
> to
> > read it and form an opinion.
>
> "1 nday" can be 1 second if you submit the tweak right before midnight.


I think 1 rday can. 1 nday has to be at least 1 day + an infinitesimal
amount of time.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss