Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:58:20 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Hurried Proposals |
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jamie Dallaire > <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I see your point, and thing both without-objection or majority-vote would > > work. My only gripe is with the time period. 1 *-day might very well be > too > > little time for those adversely affected by a proposal to actually happen > to > > read it and form an opinion. > > "1 nday" can be 1 second if you submit the tweak right before midnight. I think 1 rday can. 1 nday has to be at least 1 day + an infinitesimal amount of time. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss