|
Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:55:10 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Hurried Proposals
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Hurried Proposals
- From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:55:03 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XVgUSEpnMoLeyhHSnqGh57/PivnHpo7faoqGFYIbeIM=; b=RkSdyQ1WaQcUa1b54ZpOW46ePTSNQJRsLrR2WSyYGeg28Nk8e8/YBgUeHst+GC6e0c 6iNBoMrhqICv/uU4PUvP8LZnUbyu78dyR1DhzW2k4B/zM/O5BgEc6YrJ8kr7fEyg59Dx 16Mgs2Ge8H959rRDbXG5ushN/3pdOSgpRC8iw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CWn5OIwK8KUZ+ix2ijtRFvf9F0+UCdKu6a+NarWWxPePyqKdbcy6eRx4fjmEQEkK2A 0gReSQrs7EiK7Tmnf4uoMXOUBBotOi0h31qVALMgjH7pQyXjG9hz8P0OeLBiLTH7XKY1 Zk8u7NjAUuQAiQ4gLyiGcMPjMwoTD1defOoIs=
- In-reply-to: <501070.7179.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <501070.7179.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:32 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No. It should be votied on immediately, with the same system as normal
> Proposals, only the effects take place after one N-day, R-day or
> whatever-the-hell-we're-using-day.
>
I see your point, and thing both without-objection or majority-vote would
work. My only gripe is with the time period. 1 *-day might very well be too
little time for those adversely affected by a proposal to actually happen to
read it and form an opinion.
BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss