Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia

Elliott Hird on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:43:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:43:29 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3oE8n94oSXMTsScnjdex8wowD9aqkQwm8uu1KyZfzv0=; b=Bdy1IB0uYuxQzF3WbK+0coI2tVqqPc/4Rsv59lX3V0fZBVg/SvbdGtcFEBO4qt+2vL oySt1s0I/n7ivjQcSc0yBXmIxEfpVkVyiAbwMRGL10fojqz3K5fyyWNqLWYYn4WEdLuw QMeVlBZoaNRwTxNZQzKGT49lGo+cn1rRsKZ44=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TeDv7Ew+4KHM0SinHAGx9iaVZ72bHjMdeFRnju9YmV5vFxgZZMPsxKaXNHUnwrX+Iz wYDNLISkKEKpxuEDqC/4PhTEqSozHAziR0BhGzJY0i3pwPOop0jkGIwhZh1JZktzjia1 Yw+IOEI/jdmg0Jtb0ss4g8/8cGDxuJ+uFlW7g=
In-reply-to: <49A728FC.7090608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <376910.80954.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902230916m7d5124cdjb291e84f692123bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A2E0B3.5080502@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090226230251.E25651007C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902261530q55621bb7ie28d2b90211c5062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A728FC.7090608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/26 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Elliott Hird wrote:
>>
>> Some people think B is still in a consistent, present-day state. They are
>> wrong.
>
> Evidence?

The comment rule is highly broken -- probably leaving us somewhere in
the first era --, and if you believe one argument declared by Wooble
B's original gamestate had a paradoxical Administrator.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Joel Uckelman
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread