Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia

0x44 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:42:23 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:42:52 -0600
In-reply-to: <784a579e0902261530q55621bb7ie28d2b90211c5062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <376910.80954.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902230916m7d5124cdjb291e84f692123bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A2E0B3.5080502@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090226230251.E25651007C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902261530q55621bb7ie28d2b90211c5062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Elliott Hird wrote:

Some people think B is still in a consistent, present-day state. They are
wrong.

Evidence?

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Joel Uckelman
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Administrivia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread