|
Elliott Hird on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:07:53 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Straw poll
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Straw poll
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:07:47 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LDd50873F9L12vsM8bUQcfflZx5yeqUWgtEq3WaopBE=; b=OQ/W/zOVUVcLNS1fAP+z9nGwpIwovt1uBeWeR4NlcvQlj0rLl02NIhLWStFDmIR8O2 Veqs37rFseNtFKc8LdqSG3NRY8fL/RXNz3VzeyH4rZmsqH5xfnAYcDb+xyBNdgZ0AR08 trAxQbgn1hbr+2AXASTmvVLFAYICMpNLSNkrc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EpL35EUqZ7ErV2ais1XCEF4448Bec0qcpLNF1zXtzVt+FsO1v5cDliaIRJO3TvGeBB I24gpHVRnN//p+C25hIcHPHu3SV9SEu4VZZtotYiq8jddMNe1IrWYIF9FMwFwrqLxk3T dFj6kfCOLNZIfEu4N0CqgHwu3U6G/eMc3oYfw=
- In-reply-to: <44e5a2650902191206qfc10c59v31ad56853464a902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <653283240902191127i4e0ae5b1j7a90119df3cb4daa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650902191206qfc10c59v31ad56853464a902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009/2/19 Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I'd go with C, as I think it'll be hard to agree on any version of B. A also
> sounds good if people want to just ratify a new ruleset by fiat (essentially
> a new nomic IMO) as mentioned earlier, but honestly I don't think that is
> any different from using option C to create a gamestate that is identical to
> what we thought the gamestate of B Nomic was before all this happened.
why not just continue A nomic as is?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss