Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update

Cassie Bayer on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:28:06 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update
From: Cassie Bayer <kisse.bnomic@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:28:00 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LTSsX7lELmRZJHL606lPUZAwjEoAyc/1mlU2hlOldL0=; b=tMiIv8TM1L/TxJXXZGcIZM/9zykvqo940Ly7MGv7/Wwp9OeRRR7I4NlLoJR4Z0JSUF yPw49WsgVzD09iPCFwUbRNUrQTLo/fggN3d9n2FOimCYI44S0NA64xEFQkLZbYy7TsWp gMBnDKGmywCUXH+e3wCJrs9xH8nTxwjBWoW4Y=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jf3uFiKSW5318PY0bsgHWQMrtx+Qsf2u62UPqqReNM3AmvFLfkXaIEoYJcXFokpX0k 5PNiWb1DYL/81/hoiqr+BzY9DWCl4PDbSyV+3UiD9MH+FwvDT80rd+8xdNISiakfhZcs Mk3FZYWNWkud6ftahZdy7pj+tUaa+wd1ME5Zg=
In-reply-to: <653283240902161319s32289a9bk4fff6f23510341c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902160706r39e016b5nc8db3854ba50a365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4999D828.5050800@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240902161319s32289a9bk4fff6f23510341c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/16 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Any of the ones stating "set the rules to <set>" ought to overwrite
> > the previous ones.
>
> But I "gather" them and implement them.  To me this doesn't imply any
> ordering.

As Chairman, it would be your discretion?  As long as it's logical, and
all.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread