Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update

Jay Campbell on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:09:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:44:44 -0800
In-reply-to: <20090216184157.21F961006E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <784a579e0902160845j67fc2088j65bde1de11fa764b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4999A6EF.1080409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902161009g6f1b4fb5r7c10652c0b52adc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090216184157.21F961006E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Joel Uckelman wrote:

I hesitate to say it but: A Nomic is only dead de facto, not de jure. If you
really wanted to, I could unwedge the game state of A Nomic for you and you
could resume there.


I really want to.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
  - From: Joel Uckelman

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread