Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update

comex on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:00:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:00:48 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/AY9m8icOjRgbOJB3rR6+afdrMlNiemN2POtyJIFAvs=; b=r0DEhtt/C/+9kI3YAQU0E9HyPxX8Osx+KIZ0G9na6FG/akKnb/cWYkT47H6POiTETu zTqNbmZmcHHZTgr9anwIEmwWhZH3aBY6NiHRxUaIt4phlqv2OMs2EVK1nXgKIY++C7UW t0jKahwApjpofiufd9xOz64aAiR4dbesHTMVY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nG2tveZ6m6CrCVP6HZLynnqQYBzIWIYnlK6zmK3uX2ODchOAQwDY6K8RYFEafb/4us 1oksv5+MXURMaSgfIfDLZoqS1shPk0bJ1oQWYItu8oCN89rE1URYQ3I5QuTZf87wHNzE I8EjCqhYOtd2pqaXaGpIXveAKYr4eku/vjvIs=
In-reply-to: <20090216184157.21F961006E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <784a579e0902160845j67fc2088j65bde1de11fa764b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4999A6EF.1080409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902161009g6f1b4fb5r7c10652c0b52adc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090216184157.21F961006E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I hesitate to say it but: A Nomic is only dead de facto, not de jure. If you
> really wanted to, I could unwedge the game state of A Nomic for you and you
> could resume there.

I vote for this.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
  - From: Joel Uckelman

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread