Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:24:20 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version |
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Elliott Hird >> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Also, it's fine: Proposal number was defined as one thing in that ruleset, >>> and the old ruleset was gone, so the old proposal numbers are irrelevant. >> >> Players were defined as one thing in Era 1, and the old ruleset was >> gone, so people ceased to be Players. Nothing they claimed to do was >> valid as they were just random External Forces spamming the B lists. > > During Era 4, nobody was a player by the current definition. Yes, but if nothing happened in Eras 2 - 4, the current definition doesn't even exist. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss