Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:24:20 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version


On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Elliott Hird
>> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Also, it's fine: Proposal number was defined as one thing in that ruleset,
>>> and the old ruleset was gone, so the old proposal numbers are irrelevant.
>>
>> Players were defined as one thing in Era 1, and the old ruleset was
>> gone, so people ceased to be Players.  Nothing they claimed to do was
>> valid as they were just random External Forces spamming the B lists.
>
> During Era 4, nobody was a player by the current definition.

Yes, but if nothing happened in Eras 2 - 4, the current definition
doesn't even exist.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss