Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation v

Craig Daniel on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:17:41 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:17:35 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9B7zwUCvzIx/xaB80sCVzBuC5gWSwgz2xTVXes4hRGw=; b=ORSxkzZ3aScSG7NBsUupKfyzZVgkP+n33CAXviHGvV+etgZ2yCHZmG7WGDKrugVhdN td1eacPtK3UySMA6ZK9ygnOY2uvrZ7bj4xcYr/iW7TGSG0zEdUIbNSYxzWzsHjno7f7j M2Gy3dWbMoSqmXNL85Zt5YP+kjIBoUWMcqXcM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=T+oVoxTY7XPRJQCfFbhiIm+0XMNiD9lvqb5igtjdV1DIaAxI5dqg/ev/Q/8OhKGHtR 4GgUOdxwnz5WpHDuFTk4y8AhDQb1PScqJ3zhMnMTY1PGOoYOeBRC6T1cpNZQs2i1vWD1 vfvFO2Z3pJxroWvLv3VLzk4/tfoTx/ykaInB4=
In-reply-to: <653283240902100810l8e21b53g8b1ab5556accc07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902100743w7625cdd6p731b4f1f4e9321db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902100750v417b457ft1856c94461428575@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902100750t640168dy5112f25456d5d0e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240902100810l8e21b53g8b1ab5556accc07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Also, it's fine: Proposal number was defined as one thing in that ruleset,
>> and the old ruleset was gone, so the old proposal numbers are irrelevant.
>
> Players were defined as one thing in Era 1, and the old ruleset was
> gone, so people ceased to be Players.  Nothing they claimed to do was
> valid as they were just random External Forces spamming the B lists.

During Era 4, nobody was a player by the current definition.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Massive Gamestate Recalculation 2, the Loose Interpretation version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread