Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

Elliott Hird on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:22:46 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:22:56 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=/sPzfRwMxylzjLwJ8xkaLZdG+QqE6kOtW7MxOwZblzU=; b=hqC/C2GNLLi9pxpjhTZr/BD0tO0ZPOmvEAU+d2mmWrCUf6OiT7MK4cgtTzSMXFqMuK Ausml7flBD07EbNgJwt4CdBsEhVv5mPTYsrbjjf6Cb7iIizd+Dcf5i2MIcUTVX8nNQJO iQ7Osq4P2AZ8AUfUbCjLZKQzmEbaAAnTvMINE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=k/HTXJBZIj517hMolpf2NRs7XcEsr+EVPDfOJZ5r93ocQ5gfLZdqrBKF4SBgE3YCZb Kk9v/Bjsyjfu92ESfYnf8S0gFGfRsVZXCA66pKdxTG4V41H4F6UbuaESYjXsrb4Hu59v RED9Y+6cSTqELXF1oabnF2+QAnyxQlnIfFMc0=
In-reply-to: <4989CD92.3050704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20902032200v7893c148we4bca2a86ab645ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W32FE849475BF32C045482285C30@xxxxxxx> <CE7A2531-3421-4CD3-882B-96BD212057F0@xxxxxxxxx> <4989CD92.3050704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


On 4 Feb 2009, at 17:17, Jay Campbell wrote:

Sure it did. "Consent" doesn't do much but the announcement ofintent is necessary to meet the contract's no-objection clause.


Ah, very good point.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread