Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

Jay Campbell on Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:17:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:17:06 -0800
In-reply-to: <CE7A2531-3421-4CD3-882B-96BD212057F0@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20902032200v7893c148we4bca2a86ab645ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W32FE849475BF32C045482285C30@xxxxxxx> <CE7A2531-3421-4CD3-882B-96BD212057F0@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Elliott Hird wrote:


On 4 Feb 2009, at 08:10, James Baxter wrote:

I consent and intend to become a party to the contract below.


Didn't work.

Sure it did. "Consent" doesn't do much but the announcement of intent isnecessary to meet the contract's no-objection clause.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread