Tyler on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:39:40 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 203 |
I saw that too, BP, but I didn't go for it myself. (Although it does seem rather plausible the way you put it.) What I did go for, (or at least I'm willing to consider it possible,) was that the wording you quoted, > Contracts may be modified [...] in any [...] way allowed by that Contract. > seems to "specify" that the modification prerequisite is an activity that changes the state of the game. This makes Rule 10 apply: > A Game Action is defined as any activity specified by the Rules that > changes the state of the game. > And if "Game Actions occur upon reaching the appropriate fora" (Rule 10 again) then one just has to submit it and it happens. > > The thing is I read 5E57 as allowing just that kind of modification via > > Contract, IF the Contract specifies that it should be so. > > > > Rules: You can modify the game in any way allowed by the rules. > > Rules: You can modify a contract by whatever mechanism is specified in the > > contract. > > Contract: You can modify this contract by modifying the rules in manner X. > > > > I think that works, considering the precise wording in 5E57. "Contracts may > > be modified [...] in any [...] way allowed by that Contract." > > > > To me that sounds like the rules explicitly state that a Contract can do > > whatever it says is necessary for modifying itself. So this doesn't > > contravene 5E10. > > > > BP > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss