| Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:03:34 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject) |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 23 Jan 2009, at 23:53, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > >> But at the moment Consultations have no effect whatsoever. Who cares >> what some Priest Answers if we can just ignore it? I say we get rid >> of the Answer altogether and *just* have Oracularities that work like >> judicial orders. > > Consultations are a semi-fair process to gather consensus on the > gamestate. We already have spoon-discuss. Why do we need another procedure? Isn't that the argument against Oracularities? -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss